The True Cost of a Cheap Developer — and How to Avoid It.
When quotes come in wildly different, the cheapest is tempting. But software is one of those purchases where the lowest bid often becomes the most expensive choice. Here is how — and how to avoid it.
You pay twice
A rushed, underpriced build tends to arrive fragile: messy code, missing edge cases, no documentation. It works just long enough to get paid for. Then it breaks, and you pay a second developer to understand and fix it — often more than doing it right would have cost in the first place.
The hidden costs of "done"
Cheap quotes frequently skip the unglamorous parts that make software usable: testing, error handling, security, and a clean handover. Those are not extras — they are the difference between a demo and a product you can rely on.
Communication is part of the price
A bargain developer juggling ten clients cannot give yours real attention. Slow replies, misread requirements, and rework quietly cost you time and money that never appeared on the invoice.
How to spot real value
Look past the number. Ask how they handle testing, what you will own, how they communicate, and whether they will be around after launch. A slightly higher quote from someone who does it right, once, is almost always the cheaper path.
That is the standard I hold at AbbaCodabra: fair pricing for work that does not come back to bite you.
Ready to build something?
Tell me what you need — big project or quick fix. I'll reply within one business day.
$ start a project
~/abbacodabra